![]() |
||
Regional And Mesoscale Meteorology Team Daily Satellite Discussion Friday October 24,1997 |
||
![]() |
![]() |
Today's images focus on the use of multiple channels when interpreting
a weather system. Figure 1 is a GOES-8 10.7 micron (IR) image valid
at 1415 UTC. Figure 2 is a 0.7 micron (visible) image displayed at the
same resolution and at the same time as the IR image. The convective
system in north-western Kansas is identifiable in the IR imagery
(i.e., enhanced cold tops), but in the visible image it is difficult
to tell that the cloud shield in Kansas has a different character than
that in Nebraska. The IR image, however, does not tell the whole
story. We need the visible image to identify the developing cumuli
along the edges of the convective storm in Kansas. These developing
cells are not apparent in the IR image. In addition, the visible
image enhances the low-level stratiform clouds in Oklahoma which are
not easily seen in the enhanced IR image. The cumuli and the
stratiform clouds are not seen in the IR image because they have a
similar temperature to that of the surrounding clear ground. Thus, interpreting satellite imagery would be difficult without using multiple channels. Eric Hilgendorf We welcome your comments and discussion at
ramsdis@comet.ucar.edu |
| Information Contact: Jack Dostalek | |
| CIRA/RAMM WebMaster: Roger Phillips | |
| Author: Eric Hilgendorf | |
| Last Updated: October 24, 1997 |