NOAA-NESDIS
Regional And Mesoscale Meteorology Team
Satellite Interpretation Discussion
Tuesday August 18, 1998
It is important not to fall into the trap of assuming a one-to-one relationship between enhancement colors and atmospheric phenomena. An example of this trap deals with the water vapor (6.7 micron) imagery. The 6.7 micron enhancement will typically show the warmer pixels as reds and the cooler pixels as grays. After analyzing a few days worth of imagery, one will usually associate upper-level lows with the grays (labeled "A" in Fig 1), and upper-level highs with the reds and oranges (labeled "B" in Fig 1). Most of the time this method of analysis will result in the correct identification of features. However, care should be taken not to become too comfortable with this casual technique because there are times when the relationship between enhancement color and atmospheric feature will not apply. The imagery presented here is one such case.
Fig. 1 (NOAA GOES-10 Water Vapor)

click picture to enlarge

The imagery is from the GOES-10, 6.7 micron channel with the common water vapor enhancement. The feature of interest is the cyclonic circulation embedded within a very warm region in the East Pacific (labeled C in Fig 1). The circulations (A, B, and C) are evident in the loop. A casual analysis of the imagery based purely on enhancement color will lead to misdiagnosing feature "C" as an upper-level high.

Eric Hilgendorf and Louie Grasso

Back to top




We welcome your comments and discussion at ramsdis@comet.ucar.edu


Previous RAMMT Satellite Interpretation Discussions